Re-thinking the Glorious Revolution (notice n° 564403)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02027cam a2200217 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121124946.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Ghorbal, Karim |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Re-thinking the Glorious Revolution |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2018.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 95 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | 1688. The First Modern Revolution, published in 2009 by Steven Pincus, reinterprets in a new and ambitious way the events that constituted the Glorious Revolution of 1688-1689. Commented on by Anglo-Saxon historians, it went unnoticed within the French historical community, even though its thesis brings England’s revolutionary history closer to that of France. According to Pincus, far from being peaceful, reasonable or conservative, the Glorious Revolution was violent, popular and radical, and the conflict between James II and William of Orange did not oppose reactionary groups to progressive ones, or Catholics to Protestants, but rather two antagonistic modernizing projects. James II’s was a Tory one, and wanted to create a modern absolutist Catholic state based on an extensive land empire, a strong army, an efficient administration and a developed agriculture. On the contrary, the project developped by William of Orange and his Whigs supporters advocated the creation of a commercial and maritime empire based on manufacturing production. S. Pincus therefore broke with the exceptionalist vision of the Glorious Revolution that had long prevailed in England and the United States. For him, this revolution must be understood as the first modern revolution, comparable in many respects to the French, Russian, Chinese or Iranian revolutions. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | England |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | revolution |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | 17th century |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | 1688 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | historiography |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue d’histoire moderne & contemporaine | o 65-4 | 4 | 2018-11-27 | p. 144-161 | 0048-8003 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-moderne-et-contemporaine-2018-4-page-144?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-moderne-et-contemporaine-2018-4-page-144?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux