Rationale and process transparency do not reduce perceived red tape: evidence from a survey experiment (notice n° 569766)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02197cam a2200229 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121131622.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kaufmann, Wesley
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Rationale and process transparency do not reduce perceived red tape: evidence from a survey experiment
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2022.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 12
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Red tape is a salient societal problem but there is a dearth of research on how perceived red tape can be reduced. Building on the transparency literature, we hypothesize that higher levels of rationale and process transparency will result in lower levels of perceived red tape. We test our reasoning using a survey experiment. Specifically, we have US citizens rate the level of red tape associated with the burdensome process of obtaining a driver’s license at the Department of Motor Vehicles. We find that providing rationale and process transparency to citizens does not influence perceived red tape. Hence, organizations are advised to look for more fine-grained approaches to reduce perceptions of unnecessarily burdensome rules, while realizing that a certain level of perceived red tape is likely an unavoidable part of bureaucratic functioning. Points for practitioners The findings from this study show that merely being transparent about the rationale and process of a burdensome rule is not enough to reduce perceived red tape. Rather, policymakers and managers are advised to gain a better understanding of the different causes of red tape (disentangling genuine concerns from unfounded rhetoric), develop coherent strategies that adequately balance the trade-offs between organizational goals and citizen red tape, and be transparent about these trade-offs.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element transparence du raisonnement
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element transparence du processus
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element expérience
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element bureaucratie
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ingrams, Alex
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Jacobs, Daan
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note International Review of Administrative Sciences | 88 | 4 | 2022-12-07 | p. 735-751 | 0303-965X
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2022-4-page-735?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2022-4-page-735?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025