Some Paradoxes of “Akatalepsia” (notice n° 573670)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01227cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121133127.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Godinot, Enzo |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Some Paradoxes of “Akatalepsia” |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 41 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article analyses some paradoxes linked to the academic and sceptical uses of the concepts of katalepsis, akatalèpsia, and akatalèptos. It tries to show that it is possible to deny the possibility of katalepsis without contradiction and that Academics and Sceptics managed to avoid some infamous paradoxes (which we will call the “paradox of dissolvable dogma” or the “paradox of distinct indiscernibles”). We will show that the Academics and Sceptics were able to demonstrate their gnoseological pessimism through argumentative strategies sometimes paradoxical, but not contradictory, and best suited to our state of “ignorant ignorance”, which is an absolute ignorance that is not aware of itself. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue de métaphysique et de morale | o 122 | 2 | 2024-05-17 | p. 185-203 | 0035-1571 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2024-2-page-185?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2024-2-page-185?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux