The norm in neuropsychology, a multifaceted concept (notice n° 573806)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02279cam a2200253 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121133155.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Colombo, Françoise |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The norm in neuropsychology, a multifaceted concept |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 11 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The procedure consisting in comparing the individual's test score to a norm group has become the standard in the field of clinical neuropsychology, sometimes to the detriment of a clinical approach. Given the numerous tools of assessment available for clinicians, it is particularly important to precisely understand what underlies the concept of norms in order to adequately use them in clinical practice, without suffering their tyranny. To this end, we organized a workshop involving different experts on this topic. The present article is the fruit of their thoughts and provides some keys for gaining a better understanding of this concept. First, we present considerations on what are “normal scores,” as opposed to “pathological scores,” and discuss the issue of comparative and diagnostic norms, as well as the use of quantiles or means. We remind the reader that a norm is established for a given population and has a specific purpose. Regarding the tests themselves, their developments require specific criteria, and the discussion is oriented towards the criteria of validity and fidelity, whose importance is sometimes poorly understood and often neglected. Finally, the diversity of norms applied to widely used tests is addressed. We present the outcome of a reflection group constituted of specialists in clinical neuropsychology, attempting to define common criteria for specific tests in order to offer uniform decision criteria for a given pathological status in a given population. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | diagnostic |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | validity/fidelity |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | norm |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pathology |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | normality |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Amieva, Hélène |
Relator term | author |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Lecerf, Thierry |
Relator term | author |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Verdon, Vincent |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Revue de neuropsychologie | Volume 8 | 1 | 2016-03-09 | p. 61-69 | 2101-6739 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2016-1-page-61?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2016-1-page-61?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux