The success of non-financial ratings: An analysis through the prism of ideology (notice n° 574360)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02028cam a2200277 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121133343.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Baret, Pierre |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The success of non-financial ratings: An analysis through the prism of ideology |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 1 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The reliability of non-financial ratings is strongly criticized (Tatomir 2023; Utz 2019; Widyawati 2021). Most financial players are aware of these limitations and have alternatives to avoid having to use them. Paradoxically, these same players are usually the first to endorse them. How can we explain these a priori counter-intuitive, even irrational behaviors? Various concepts can shed light on this: “management fashion” (Abrahamson 1996), “collective beliefs” (Orlean 2008), “cognitive biases” (Thaler 1980), “mimetic behaviors” (Esposito 2013), and so on. Our research aims to enrich this theoretical framework with a comprehensive perspective that avoids assuming that financial actors’ judgment is somehow flawed. To this end, we rework the concept of “ideology” on the basis of Boudon's work (1986), complemented by that of Piketty (2019). Our aim is to show that, once rigorously defined, this concept will make it possible to draw a clear distinction between the scientific and non-scientific aspects of the success of ESG ratings. Thus defined, ideology gives rise to “good reasons” to explain the apparent irrationality of financial actors’ choices. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ESG criteria |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CSR |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ideology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | non-financial rating |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | non-financial rating |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | rational choices |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ideology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ESG criteria |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CSR |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Renaud, Emmanuel |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Responsible Organization Review | 19 | 1 | 2024-03-15 | p. 55-71 | 1951-0187 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-responsible-organization-review-2024-1-page-55?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-responsible-organization-review-2024-1-page-55?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux