The neuropsychology of habit: How a historical perspective can shed light on current issues (notice n° 574496)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02399cam a2200217 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121133413.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Péron, Julie Anne |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The neuropsychology of habit: How a historical perspective can shed light on current issues |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 40 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | One major obstacle to understanding the mechanisms behind the acquisition and expression of habits seems to be the conceptual confusion that has reigned in this area of psychology research for so many decades. This confusion (or lack of consensus) is largely due to the fact that, between the 1960s and early 1990s, research on this topic was conducted in parallel in the fields of animal and human cognitive science, leading to terminological differences. Understanding how the concept of habit emerged makes it possible to identify and define the various related terms or synonyms, to know how they came about, and, ultimately, to propose an operational and consensual definition of habits.This article provides a brief history of the concept of habit in the humanities, psychology, and cognitive neuropsychology. It is divided into six parts. First, we relate the earliest occurrences of the term at the end of the nineteenth century, in the field of human sciences. Second, we look at the behavioral context in which the concept of habit was originally studied in psychology. Third, we describe how cognitive psychologists abandoned this concept in order to develop related but distinct concepts. Fourth, we examine how cognitive neuropsychology studies in patients with amnesic syndromes led to habit being conceptualized as a subcomponent of nondeclarative memory. Fifth, we discuss the reemergence of parallel studies in animals and humans, especially studies of frontal-subcortical syndromes. Sixth, and finally, we identify areas of apparent agreement, as well as those subject to debate (or at least discussion), in this promising research on the neuropsychology of habit. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | instrumental conditioning |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | procedural memory |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | implicit memory |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | habits |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | basal ganglia |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Revue de neuropsychologie | Volume 11 | 2 | 2019-10-06 | p. 124-133 | 2101-6739 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2019-2-page-124?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2019-2-page-124?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux