Systematic review of the uptake and design of Action Research in published nursing research, 2000-2005 (notice n° 578007)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02299cam a2200241 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121135245.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Munn-Giddings, Carol |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Systematic review of the uptake and design of Action Research in published nursing research, 2000-2005 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 52 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Action Research (AR) is encouraged for health care development. A systematic review was undertaken to gain insight into the uptake and design of practice-based AR. Empirical research papers from 2000 to 2005 were extracted from CINAHL, MEDLINE, the British Nursing Index, and two specialist AR journals. The initial search identified 335 papers: 38% were AR (20% were phenomenology; 32% ethnography; 10% randomized-controlled trials). Further filtering produced 62 AR papers for detailed analysis. Eighty-seven percent of AR studies involved “organizational/professional development” or “educational” settings; only 13% were directly “clinical.” Practitioners were the main participants in 90% of studies. Seventy-two percent of all participant groups were rated “active” in the research process, yet 70% percent of first (lead) authors were from an academic institution. Patients/carers were generally passive in the research process and absent from authorship. Ninety per cent of studies used two or more methods, predominantly qualitative. Forty-four percent of articles identified external funding sources, relatively high for nursing research. Participatory AR has a strong identity in practice-based research, with a diversity of methods. The focus reflects that of nursing research generally. A high level of participation by practitioners is evident but with little equity in authorship. Service user/carer involvement should be given more prominence by researchers. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | methodology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | research design |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | nursing research |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | participation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | action research |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | McVicar, Andrew |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Smith, Lesley |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Recherche en soins infirmiers | o 100 | 1 | 2010-03-01 | p. 124-133 | 0297-2964 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-recherche-en-soins-infirmiers-2010-1-page-124?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-recherche-en-soins-infirmiers-2010-1-page-124?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux