How can empathy deficit in adolescents be characterized and evaluated clinically? A literature review (notice n° 578417)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02191cam a2200241 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121135432.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Piñon, Mélanie |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | How can empathy deficit in adolescents be characterized and evaluated clinically? A literature review |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 31 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Introduction: empathy has long been considered through the lens of human sciences. Today, certain neuro-scientific postulates complement this knowledge. Context: observation of adolescents presenting psychiatric disorders, accompanied by conduct disorders and/or psychopathic traits, frequently display empathy deficits. Nurses should evaluate the nature and the degree of empathy of these adolescents. Aims: this literature review aims to set out the clinical characteristics of empathy deficit using its definition, and to describe the clinical evaluation tools. Method: the target population of this review is children and adolescents from twelve to eighteen years old. The review was carried out using works from PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from 2002 to 2012. Results: twenty-two articles were selected. Empathy is defined as a mechanism combining several components of neuronal activity. Empathy includes a cognitive component and an affective component, which are based on a neurofunctional dysfunctional substrate when there is an empathy deficit. Three evaluation scales are distinguished: the Basic Empathy Scale, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the Griffith Empathy Measure. Discussion: three evaluation tools present the validity and reliability criteria for clinical use. Conclusion: the development of evidence-based practices should confirm the usefulness of these tools for nurses. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | conduct disorders |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | scale |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | deficit |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | empathy |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | adolescent development |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Forestier, Aline |
Relator term | author |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Diby, Marc |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Recherche en soins infirmiers | o 125 | 2 | 2016-07-05 | p. 61-67 | 0297-2964 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-recherche-en-soins-infirmiers-2016-2-page-61?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-recherche-en-soins-infirmiers-2016-2-page-61?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux