Health Expertise: A Practice-Based Approach (notice n° 586018)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02134cam a2200229 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121143010.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Daniel, Christine |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Health Expertise: A Practice-Based Approach |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2012.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 88 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | As a result of various public health crises, expertise in health risk assessment in France has become the responsibility of autonomous state agencies. However, practice shows that despite the institutional separation of expertise and decision-making, the link between health risk assessment and the management of health risks by the public authorities remains ambiguous. Tensions have emerged between the state and the various agencies responsible for providing expertise, especially in cases where agencies make recommendations on procedures and protocols. In addition, while a significant number of regulations have been designed to protect the independence of experts in the health sector, their implementation raises a wide range of practical issues. The number and nature of the common interests of experts and professionals in the health sector complicate the identification and management of potential conflicts of interest. Collaboration between expert bodies only partly compensates for these difficulties. Finally, the involvement of ’stakeholders’ concerned by the results of expertise have sparked a debate that remains unresolved. While some view it as a source of greater knowledge, others have seen the participation of ’lay’ experts as a threat to the quality and impartiality of expertise. Regardless of the preferred approach, recent events show that stakeholders play a key role in health risk monitoring and assessment. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | medical expertise |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | lobby. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | health security |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | risk management |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bas-Théron, Françoise |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Durand, Nicolas |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Santé Publique | 24 | 1 | 2012-04-01 | p. 41-47 | 0995-3914 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2012-1-page-41?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2012-1-page-41?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux