Legal Cultures and the Regulation of Coaching Practice: Different Jurisdictions, Different Approaches? (notice n° 587117)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03076cam a2200217 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121143428.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Greenfield, Steve
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Legal Cultures and the Regulation of Coaching Practice: Different Jurisdictions, Different Approaches?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2017.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 16
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In all the four countries discussed sport plays a significant role within society and has been used as a vehicle for the delivery of a range of policy objectives. In England and Wales this has varied from health through to aspects of criminal justice. As negligence liability has developed, within each legal system, those involved in the organization, administration and delivery of sport have become subject to both actual and potential liability. This may have serious consequences for sport as an area of civil society, coaching practices and indeed coaches. This paper charts the civil liability and subsequent regulation of coaches, within 3 jurisdictions that all have historical roots in the English Common Law system. It also introduces a fourth non-legal approach to potential coach liability, for injury compensation, through New Zealand’s no fault compensation scheme established under the Accident Compensation Act 1972. A key consideration is the extent to which the history and culture of the national legal system has shaped and informs the contemporary approach to coach liability.England & Wales: ‘Unrestricted’ negligence liabilityThe common law tort of negligence has developed through the application of general principles since 1932 and coaches have never enjoyed any privileged protected status to alleviate liability whilst limited State intervention has proved ineffective.USA: State Volunteer Immunity from suitThe negligence liability of coaches for injuries suffered by athletes has been qualified by the concept of sovereign immunity in the public sector. Furthermore the federal system has permitted States to directly intervene to protect volunteer coaches through Volunteer Protection Acts though on a piecemeal basis.South Africa: Liability moved from individual educators to State LevelSchools Act 84/1996 s 60: Teachers in Public Schools who are coaching are not personally liable for damages in negligence for injuries to pupils – liability rests with the State itself.New Zealand: Removing Liability from coachesThe application, since 1974, of a State run no fault compensation scheme provides an alternative route to those injured by coach negligence.The paper will explore similarities and differences in legal systems, cultures and outcomes for coaches. A fundamental question is whether the historical roots and the legal culture have become insurmountable obstacles to change.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element State
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Negligence
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Coaching
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Legal culture
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Liability
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Staps | o 114 | 4 | 2017-03-24 | p. 87-96 | 0247-106X
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-staps-2016-4-page-87?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-staps-2016-4-page-87?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025