Validation of an interprofessional communication tool for primary care nurses (notice n° 588282)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02065cam a2200193 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121143931.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Karam, Marlène |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Validation of an interprofessional communication tool for primary care nurses |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 36 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Introduction: Barriers to communication within interprofessional teams often include the lack of a common, standardized, and precise tool, especially for nurses’ notes. The lack of such structuring hampers effective information transfer and puts patient safety at risk. This risk is exacerbated when a patient transitions from one care setting to another. A validated standardized tool would harmonize data collection and transfer, and improve continuity of patient care. Purpose of the research: To validate an initial nursing assessment tool for users by potential users and beneficiaries. Methods: The initial tool was developed by a registered nurse following a literature review and stakeholder consultation. Subsequently, a Delphi survey was carried out online with 21 stakeholders from different disciplines and a user-partner to validate it. Participants judged the relevance of the tool’s items on a Likert scale. Relative frequencies were calculated. Results: Validation required two Delphi rounds. The original 21 items were retained, along with 118 sub-items. The sub-items deemed irrelevant because they were redundant or required further evaluation related to mobility, balance, and the user’s social environment. Conclusions: Involving stakeholders in this validation process increases the likelihood of the results being relevant and facilitates the integration of the desired change into their daily practice. |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Gaulin, Claire |
Relator term | author |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Maaroufi, Saoussen |
Relator term | author |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Gervais, Sylvie |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Santé Publique | 36 | 4 | 2024-09-18 | p. 79-92 | 0995-3914 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2024-4-page-79?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2024-4-page-79?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux