Repos hebdomadaire et respect du jour du Seigneur : le cas britannique (notice n° 658155)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02659cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121191454.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Roudaut, Emmanuel |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Repos hebdomadaire et respect du jour du Seigneur : le cas britannique |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2009.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 14 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cet article brosse à grands traits l’évolution du célèbre « dimanche anglais », dont l’austérité a longtemps frappé les voyageurs venus du continent. La question de l’observance du jour du Seigneur, source de clivage au XVIIe siècle, semble avoir fait l’objet d’un compromis après la restauration de la monarchie en 1660. Les Sunday Observance Acts de 1677 et 1780, qui marquent l’adhésion de la dynastie régnante à une observance rigoureuse autrefois prônée par leurs adversaires puritains, resteront en vigueur jusqu’à la fin du XXe siècle. La relative souplesse de leur application, qui résistera aux campagnes menées par divers groupes de pression, est probablement la première cause de cette longévité. Si la situation actuelle est aux antipodes des mornes dimanches victoriens, elle est le résultat d’une adaptation graduelle et pragmatique, comme le montre a contrario l’échec de la libéralisation radicale voulue par le gouvernement en 1986. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This paper outlines the origins of the “English Sunday”, the austerity of which was, until recently, a source of dismay for Continental visitors. The strict observance of the Lord’s Day, or “Sabbath-keeping”, proved to be a particularly divisive issue in the seventeenth century. However, a compromise seems to have been reached after the Restoration of 1660. The passing of two major Sunday Observance Acts, in 1677 and 1780 suggests that the new order established by the later Stuarts and their Hanoverian successors was imbued with some of the very values defended by their erstwhile opponents, the Puritans. These acts were still in force in the second half of the twentieth century, probably because they were applied with great flexibility, despite the efforts of the Sabbatarians. If the present situation has nothing in common with the dullness of Victorian Sundays, it is the result of a pragmatic and incremental evolution. Most attempts to impose swift and radical change, be it towards more rigorous enforcement or on the contrary towards liberalisation, as in 1986, ended in failure. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Histoire, économie & société | 28e aée | 3 | 2009-09-01 | p. 109-120 | 0752-5702 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-histoire-economie-et-societe-2009-3-page-109?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-histoire-economie-et-societe-2009-3-page-109?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux