The Beveridge Report and Its Implementation: a Revolutionary Project? (notice n° 662933)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01852cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121193203.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Whiteside, Noel |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The Beveridge Report and Its Implementation: a Revolutionary Project? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2014.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 26 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cet article propose de réinterpréter le célèbre rapport Beveridge de 1942 et d’en réévaluer le contenu. Sur bien des aspects, la réputation du texte comme une étape clé de la construction d’un État-providence juste et équitable est usurpée et son influence sur les réformes de la protection sociale britannique d'après-guerre a été exagérée. L’article remet le rapport Beveridge dans son contexte historique et montre que, quels que soient ses mérites au moment de sa publication, c’est aujourd’hui un document daté, et mal lu et interprété par les chercheurs en sciences sociales, qui se font les relais d’interprétations mythiques, injustifiables historiquement. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This paper revisits the famous Beveridge Report of 1942 with the object of re-evaluating its contents. It argues that, on several counts, the reputation of the text as a blueprint for a socially just and equitable welfare state is misplaced and that its influence on British post-war welfare reform has been exaggerated. The paper locates the Beveridge Report within its historical context to argue that, whatever its merits at the time of its publication, it is now a dated document which is widely misinterpreted by contemporary social policy writers, who perpetuate mythical interpretations in a manner that is not historically justifiable. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Histoire@Politique | 24 | 3 | 2014-09-01 | p. 24-37 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-histoire-politique-2014-3-page-24?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-histoire-politique-2014-3-page-24?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux