Are There Good Penal Metrics? (notice n° 693695)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01644cam a2200229 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121210954.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Leclerc, Chloé
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Are There Good Penal Metrics?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2009.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 19
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Assessments of the severity scales of penalties handed down by criminal courts have not been well researched. This paper suggests that the public as well as court actors incorporate a sensitivity to over-punishment that is not manifest in the scales of the perceived seriousness of crimes. It also suggests that aggregate measures of severity scales are not appropriate because neither the public nor the court actors agree on the underlying measurements of these scales. This paper demonstrates that some scales are more consistent than others and produce more reasonable exchange rates between prison and non-prison penalties (such as fines, probation, or community work). One interesting finding is that the public exhibits equal “expertise” in penal metric as sentencing professionals (judges, defense attorneys, prosecutors, or probation officers). This paper also discusses the implications for sentencing guidelines of intermediate penalties.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PENAL SEVERITY
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PENAL METRIC
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SENTENCING GUIDELINES
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PENAL EXCHANGE RATES
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Tremblay, Pierre
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Déviance et Société | 32 | 4 | 2009-01-05 | p. 411-434 | 0378-7931
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-deviance-et-societe-2008-4-page-411?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-deviance-et-societe-2008-4-page-411?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025