Pratiques langagières et registres discursifs (notice n° 738791)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 05173cam a2200325 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123090633.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Cambon, Emmanuelle |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Pratiques langagières et registres discursifs |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 12 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | L’article cherche à mettre en évidence les liens, les incompatibilités, les articulations entre deux cadres théoriques dont la visée explicite est une sociologie du langage : Boutet, Fiala, Simonin-Grumbach (1976) ou Ebel, Fiala (1983) proposent d’envisager des pratiques langagières constitutives d’une formation langagière ; Achard (1995) propose de parler de registres discursifs constitutifs d’une formation discursive. Partageant un refus de la théorie du reflet et considérant le langage ou le discours comme un acte dans le monde davantage que comme une représentation de celui-ci, partageant également une réflexion sur les rapports entre langage et fonctionnement social, ces deux cadres n’entretiennent pourtant pas de rapports explicites l’un avec l’autre. Il s’agit ici d’interroger les différentes notions proposées – et en particulier celles de pratique langagière et de registre discursif – dans les rapports qu’elles peuvent entretenir avant de proposer des éléments d’unification. L’idée d’un rapprochement entre ces deux cadres vient des deux couples de notions : pratiques langagières/formation langagière – pratiques discursives/formation discursive. Or, la question est de savoir si l’on a affaire à deux objets empiriques distincts, pratiques et registres, ou à deux points de vue différents sur un même objet empirique, le langage envisagé dans son rapport aux fonctionnements sociaux. Dans les deux cas, on a affaire à deux objets empiriques différents, mais s’il s’agit de deux points de vue sur le langage et le social, on est conduit à s’interroger sur la sociologie du langage susceptible de se dégager d’une articulation entre les deux cadres et les deux couples de notion. L’article présente les différentes notions – à travers des définitions et des exemples – ainsi que les rapports qu’elles entretiennent aux formations (langagière ou discursive). Puis, nous avançons quelques propositions d’articulation entre ces deux cadres. Nous verrons enfin que la question du discours, qui pourrait n’apparaître que terminologique, devient alors cruciale. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Language practice and discursive registers. Investigating two frameworks in the sociology of language The article seeks to highlight the links, incompatibilities, and common ground of two theoretical frameworks, both of which explicitly seek a sociology of language. Boutet, Fiala, Simonin-Grumbach (1976) or Ebel, Fiala (1983) consider language practice as constituting language formation ; Achard (1995) proposes that discursive registers go together to form discursive formation. Both refuse the theory of reflection and consider that language or discourse as a world-bound act rather than a representation of the world ; they also share a preoccupation with the relationship between language and social function, despite having no explicit links to one another. The article considers the various concepts proposed – and in particular language practice and discursive register – in terms of the relationships they may develop, before proposing possible unifying elements. The idea of an association between these two frameworks comes from the two pairs of concepts, language practice / language development and discursive practice / discursive formation. The question is whether these are two empirically distinct objects, i.e. practice and register, or two different views of a single empirical object, i.e. language considered in its relationship with social function. In both cases we are dealing with two different empirical objects, but in the case where we have two views of language and social function, it becomes necessary to consider what type of sociology of language is likely to emerge from an articulation of these two frameworks and these two pairs of concepts. The article presents the various concepts – with definitions and examples – as well as the relationships they uphold with the two types of development (language and discursive). It then puts forward a few proposals for articulating these two frameworks. This allows the question of discourse, which might at first sight appear merely terminological, to emerge as a crucial element. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | discours |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pratiques langagières |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | sociologie du langage |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cadre théorique |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | épistémologie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | registre |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | epistemology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | register |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | language practice |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | sociolo y of language |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | theoretical framework |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | discourse |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Léglise, Isabelle |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Langage et société | 124 | 2 | 2008-06-19 | p. 15-38 | 0181-4095 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2008-2-page-15?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2008-2-page-15?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux