L'adoption du Project Management Office en France : un retard à déplorer, une incompatibilité culturelle ou une résistance à la mode managériale ? (notice n° 746408)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02683cam a2200193 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123092911.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Quang Dang, Quyên Vo |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | L'adoption du Project Management Office en France : un retard à déplorer, une incompatibilité culturelle ou une résistance à la mode managériale ? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2007.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 40 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Résumé Cet article s’intéresse au décalage quant à la diffusion de la notion de PMO (Project Management Office) en France et aux Etats-Unis. Le PMO se présente comme une partie de l’organisation qui vise à centraliser tout ou partie du pilotage et du suivi des projets d’une entreprise, comme le soulignent Rad et Levin (2002) : “The PMO is referred to by different titles such as Project Office, Project support Office, Project Management Office, Project Management Group, Project Management Center of Excellence, or Directorate of Project Management. Independent of the operational title, a PMO is the organizational entity with full-time personnel to provide a focal point for the discipline of project management”. Après avoir dressé un état de l’art de la notion de PMO, cet article dresse une typologie des PMOs à partir d’une enquête auprès de 10 entreprises ayant une expérience dans le domaine. Il explore ensuite trois pistes d’explications du décalage de diffusion du concept entre la France et les Etats-Unis. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article deals with the diffusion of the concept of Project Management Office in France and in the US. A PMO aims at centralizing project management within an organization as Rad and Levin (2002) have it: “The PMO is referred to by different titles such as Project Office, Project support Office, Project Management Office, Project Management Group, Project Management Center of Excellence, or Directorate of Project Management. Independent of the operational title, a PMO is the organizational entity with full-time personnel to provide a focal point for the discipline of project management”. This paper is organized in three parts. First the literature about PMOs is reviewed. Then we propose a taxonomy of PMOs stemming from a survey done with 10 companies using PMOs in France. Finally we formulate three reasons explaining the gap between France and the US in the diffusion of this project management approach. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Pinatton, Stéphane |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Boudès, Thierry |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Management & Avenir | 12 | 2 | 2007-04-01 | p. 105-125 | 1768-5958 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-management-et-avenir-2007-2-page-105?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-management-et-avenir-2007-2-page-105?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux