Pertinence des traitements interceptifs de classe II. Mise en perspective avec la validité des moyens conventionnels d’étude (notice n° 767982)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04099cam a2200361 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123104639.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Pastwa, Elise |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Pertinence des traitements interceptifs de classe II. Mise en perspective avec la validité des moyens conventionnels d’étude |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2021.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 97 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ObjectifLa pertinence du traitement interceptif de classe II est controversée. L’objectif de cette revue de la littérature était de relever ses indications et si un bénéfice était prouvé. Matériel et méthodeNous avons effectué une recherche systématique sur PubMed de 1999 à 2019 par mots clés sur les essais contrôlés randomisés. RésultatsQuatorze articles ont été retenus, majoritairement de grade B ou C. Les critères évalués étaient dentaires, squelettiques, psychologiques, esthétiques, ainsi que le coût, la durée, les fractures incisives, le taux d’avulsions, la complexité et le besoin de traitement. Le surplomb est un critère important d’indication de traitement interceptif, mais il n’est pas le seul. Le critère squelettique, évalué majoritairement par l’ANB, n’est significatif que pour trois articles ; l’amélioration de l’estime de soi est prouvée dans un article et le traitement interceptif permet une amélioration esthétique (alignement des incisives maxillaires). Le coût global et la durée du traitement seraient significativement plus élevés pour le traitement en deux temps. Dans deux articles seulement, les auteurs se demandent si le traitement interceptif facilite le traitement futur. Le taux de fracture incisive et d’avulsions compensatrices est largement étudié. DiscussionLes principaux critères étudiés sont l’ANB (indicateur controversé), le taux de fractures incisives (trauma) et le surplomb. ConclusionCertains résultats non significatifs méritent d’être mis en perspective avec les objectifs des études et les moyens utilisés. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ObjectiveThe relevance of Class II interceptive therapy is controversial. The objective of this literature review was to note its indications and if a benefit is proven. Materials and MethodsWe carried out a systematic search on PubMed from 1999 to 2019 by keywords on randomized trials. ResultsFourteen articles were selected, mainly grade B or C. The criteria evaluated were dental, skeletal, psychological, aesthetic, as well as cost, duration, incisor fractures, rate of stroke, complexity and treatment need. Overjet is an important criterion for the indication of interceptive treatment, but it is not the only one. The skeletal criterion, assessed mainly by the ANB, is only significant for three articles; the improvement of self-esteem is proven in one article and the interceptive treatment allows an aesthetic improvement (alignment of the maxillary incisors). The overall cost of treatment would be higher for two-step treatment. In only two articles, the authors wonder if the interceptive treatment facilitates future treatment. The rate of compensatory strokes and extractions are widely studied. DiscussionThe main criteria studied are ANB (controversial indicator), incisor fracture rate (trauma) and overjet. ConclusionCertain non-significant results must be put into perspective with the aim of the studies and the methods used. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Traitement précoce |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Traitement en deux temps |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Orthopédie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Efficacité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Classe II |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Résultat de traitement |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Revue |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Two-step treatment |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Review |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Effectiveness |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Orthopedics |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Treatment outcome |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Early treatment |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Class II |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Haïm, Frédéric |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gebeile-Chauty, Sarah |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L'Orthodontie Française | 92 | 4 | 2021-10-01 | p. 443-452 | 1966-5202 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-orthodontie-francaise-2021-4-page-443?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-orthodontie-francaise-2021-4-page-443?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux