Distaliseur in-office façon Motion Carriere versus les bielles de Herbst : une étude comparative par superposition sur 156 cas (notice n° 768203)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04555cam a2200361 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123104721.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bardin, Clarisse |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Distaliseur in-office façon Motion Carriere versus les bielles de Herbst : une étude comparative par superposition sur 156 cas |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 37 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Introduction : Parmi les dispositifs thérapeutiques de classe II à appui dentaire, le Carriere Motion Appliance (Henri Schein) a été proposé en 2004 puis des adaptations in-office. L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer, par superpositions, les effets dento-squelettiques du distaliseur in-office (D) proche du Carriere Motion Appliance par rapport au traitement de référence, les bielles de Herbst (B). Matériel et méthode : Une étude rétrospective en intention de traiter a été menée. Les patients devaient être en classe II, division 1 bilatérale, avoir du potentiel de croissance, deux téléradiographies de profil successives. Les critères évalués étaient céphalométriques, essentiellement issus de l’analyse de Pancherz. Des tests statistiques ont été réalisés avec un seuil de 5 %. Résultats : Au total, 116 patients traités par D et appareil multi-attache (MA) et 40 patients traités par B et MA ont été inclus. D et B permettent de freiner l’avancée maxillaire, favoriser l’avancée mandibulaire et corriger le décalage squelettique de classe II. Ils normalisent la classe molaire en distalant l’arcade maxillaire (palato-position des incisives maxillaires, recul de la première molaire maxillaire) et en mésialant l’arcade mandibulaire (vestibulo-position et vestibulo-version des incisives mandibulaires de 5 à 6°, avancée de la première molaire mandibulaire). Ils permettent un bon contrôle de la divergence faciale avec néanmoins une bascule horaire du plan d’occlusion. Discussion : Des essais randomisés sont nécessaires pour confirmer nos résultats. Conclusion : À effets indésirables proches, le distaliseur in-office peut constituer une alternative intéressante par son volume moindre, son confort et sa facilité de conception. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Introduction: Among the class II dental supported therapeutic devices, the Carriere Motion Appliance (Henri Schein) was introduced in 2004 followed by in-office adjustments. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by superimpositions, the dento-skeletal effects of the in-office distalizer (D) close to the Carriere Motion Appliance compared to the reference treatment: the Herbst appliance (B). Material and Method: A retrospective intention-to-treat study was conducted. Patients had to be in class II, 1 bilateral, have growth potential, two successive lateral cephalograms. The criteria evaluated were cephalometric, mainly from the Pancherz analysis. Statistical tests were performed with a threshold of 5%. Results: Overall, 116 patients treated with D and multi-attachment appliance (MA) and 40 patients treated with B and MA were included. D and B slow maxillary advance, stimulate mandibular advance and correct the skeletal Class II. They normalize the molar class by distalizing the maxillary arch (palato-position of the maxillary incisors, retreat of the maxillary first molar) and by mesializing the mandibular arch (vestibulo-position and vestibulo-version of the mandibular incisors by 5 to 6°, advance of the mandibular first molar). They provide good control of facial divergence, but with a clockwise tilt of the occlusal plane. Discussion: Randomized trials are needed to confirm our results. Conclusion: With similar adverse effects, the in-office distalizer may be an interesting alternative because of its smaller volume, comfort and easy manufacture. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Classe II / |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Carriere Motion Appliance |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | In-office |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Effets indésirables |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Plan d’occlusion |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Bielles de Herbst |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Distaliseur |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Carriere Motion Appliance |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Distalizer |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Side effects |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Class II /In-office |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Herbst Appliance |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Occlusal plane |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Strippoli, Julien |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Straub, Denis |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gebeile-Chauty, Sarah |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L'Orthodontie Française | 95 | 2 | 2024-04-01 | p. 205-229 | 1966-5202 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-orthodontie-francaise-2024-2-page-205?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-orthodontie-francaise-2024-2-page-205?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux