Le loup en tribunes : analyse comparée de deux discours argumentatifs sur une espèce controversée (notice n° 770860)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03586cam a2200325 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250123105425.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Chandelier, Marie
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Le loup en tribunes : analyse comparée de deux discours argumentatifs sur une espèce controversée
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2016.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 14
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Cet article propose une approche discursive de la controverse liée à la présence du loup en France. L’analyse comparée de deux plaidoyers, l’un défavorable, l’autre favorable au retour de l’espèce, parus respectivement dans Libération et Le Monde fin 2014, met en évidence l’existence de représentations opposées de l’équilibre environnemental. Les groupes de signataires privilégient un équilibre entre l’élevage et la nature, perturbé par le loup ( Libération), et un équilibre entre le loup et la nature, perturbé par l’homme ( Le Monde). La communauté socioécologique décrite doit sa stabilité à la mise à l’écart totale ou partielle d’un acteur du territoire. Les marques de présence des acteurs mettent en évidence deux autorités aboutissant à la formation d’un discours objectivé par un ethos scientifique ( Libération), et d’un discours subjectivé par un ethos militant ( Le Monde).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The wolf in opinion pages: a comparative analysis of argumentative discourses on a controversial speciesThe recovery of the grey wolf population in France has generated numerous conflicts, which have been studied by many disciplines including the social sciences. Our paper shows that a discursive approach to these controversies can offer new insights and help to understand the continuing oppositions between the various actors involved. A comparative analysis of the argumentative discourses developed in two articles published by two national French newspapers, Libération and Le Monde, highlights two contrasting representations of environmental equilibria. The first aims at an equilibrium between livestock and nature ( Libération), the second at an equilibrium between wolves and nature ( Le Monde), each equilibrium being disrupted respectively by wolves and humans. The stability of the social-ecological community is based on the exclusion of one actor. Despite a similar formal structure, each article develops a specific authority through the interaction between the peritext and the text, and through the enunciative system in order to legitimate the author’s representations. In the Libération article, we show that the scientific authority serves to objectify and thus legitimate the argumentative discourse, whereas in Le Monde, a militant authority subjectifies the discourse. In both papers, the authority is also closely linked to the identity of the country (France). Both articles have a polemical dimension, which is however more explicit in Le Monde where the opponents are clearly identified.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element environnement
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element sciences de la conservation
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element biodiversité
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element linguistique
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element agriculture
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element biodiversity
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element linguistics
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element environment
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element agriculture
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element conservation sciences
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mathevet, Raphaël
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Steuckardt, Agnès
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Sarale, Jean-Marc
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Natures Sciences Sociétés | 24 | 2 | 2016-08-29 | p. 136-146 | 1240-1307
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2016-2-page-136?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2016-2-page-136?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025