Dynamiques d’intégration des espaces naturels protégés en France : une approche comparative entre parcs nationaux et réserves naturelles (notice n° 770935)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03243cam a2200337 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250123105434.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Cosson, Arnaud
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Dynamiques d’intégration des espaces naturels protégés en France : une approche comparative entre parcs nationaux et réserves naturelles
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2017.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 67
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Ces trente dernières années, les espaces naturels protégés (ENP) ont connu un changement majeur de paradigme, des approches ségrégatives aux approches intégratives. Les cadres d’analyse traitant de la transformation des systèmes socioécologiques et des biens communs permettent de comparer ce processus de transformation entre deux grands types d’ENP en France : les parcs nationaux et les réserves naturelles. Tandis que les trajectoires d’intégration des parcs s’expliquent par une injonction descendante, celles de certaines réserves sont issues de processus ascendants. Si la comparaison entre parcs et réserves révèle des variables clés dans la mise en œuvre des approches intégratives (leadership, capital social, articulation entre niveaux de règle), leur articulation diffère du fait de l’histoire de ces outils, de l’origine du processus de transformation et d’effets d’échelle.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Towards integration in French protected areas: a comparative approach between National Parks and Nature ReservesProtected areas (PA) have undergone a major paradigmatic shift over the past 30 years, from segregative to integrative models. Drawing on the literature on the transformation of social-ecological systems and Ostrom’s institutional analysis, we compare this evolution for two types of protected areas in France : national parks and nature reserves. Whereas the former are characterized by a top-down implementation of the integrative model, the latter present a more bottom-up integration. A comparison of empirical fieldwork conducted in two national parks and ten nature reserves highlights three key variables in the implementation of integrative approaches in PA : leadership, social capital and the three levels of rules-in-use (constitutional, collective and operational). By combining these three elements, PA managers are able to navigate in specific and ever changing social-ecological contexts towards integrative PA models. However, their leeway differs for national parks and nature reserves, depending on historical aspects, the impetus at the origin of transformation, and the scale effect.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element système socioécologique
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element gouvernance
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element biodiversité
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element espace naturel protégé
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element France
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element governance
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element protected area
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element social-ecological system
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element biodiversity
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element France
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Therville, Clara
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mathevet, Raphaël
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mauz, Isabelle
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Bioret, Frédéric
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Natures Sciences Sociétés | 25 | 3 | 2017-11-15 | p. 230-240 | 1240-1307
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2017-3-page-230?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2017-3-page-230?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025