The french and british change in position in the CESDP : a security community and historical -institutionalist perspective (notice n° 785780)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02093cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123113741.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gegout, Catherine |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The french and british change in position in the CESDP : a security community and historical -institutionalist perspective |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2002.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 73 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The Helsinki European Council conclusions of December 1999 aimed at strengthening the Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP). The EU Member States decided that the EU should be able to assume its responsibilities for the full range of conflict prevention and crisis management tasks required to deal with crises such as the Balkan crisis. They are currently looking at the degree of the autonomous capacity of the EU to take decisions, and where NATO as a whole is not engaged, to conduct EU-led military operations in response to international crises. This paper argues that France and the United Kingdom reached a more than “Lowest Common Denominator” (LCD) agreements when they negotiated the creation of the CESDP: they changed their initial positions, and the UK changed its preference. These EU Member States were mainly motivated by the way the United States dealt with the Balkans’ crises. They were then constrained in their action by the US and the EU’s institutions. Realism, the conventional theory which is expected to explain high politics decision-making processes does not seem appropriate here to explain the change in the British and French position: the security community concept and historical institutionalism might be more useful here. This paper is divided into two main parts. The first one analyses the creation and substance of the CESDP, while the second one focuses on the evolution of the French and British change in position and looks at the possible explanations for this. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Politique européenne | 8 | 4 | 2002-12-01 | p. 62-87 | 1623-6297 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-europeenne-2002-4-page-62?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politique-europeenne-2002-4-page-62?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux