Nouvelle vie de couple, nouvelle vie commune ? Processus de remise en couple après une séparation (notice n° 791967)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 05639cam a2200397 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250123115527.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Régnier-Loilier, Arnaud |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Nouvelle vie de couple, nouvelle vie commune ? Processus de remise en couple après une séparation |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 54 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | La conjugalité a connu de nombreuses évolutions en France. On observe, d’une part, une diversification des formes d’unions (mariage, cohabitation hors mariage, pacs, relations non cohabitantes) et, d’autre part, la discontinuité des parcours amoureux, marqués par des séparations et remises en couple plus fréquentes. Partant de ce double constat, cet article étudie le lien entre l’histoire conjugale passée et la forme, cohabitation ou non, que prend l’union suivante. La plupart des études sur la remise en couple l’abordent sous le seul prisme de la vie commune. Elles occultent la conjugalité non cohabitante comme forme d’union à part entière et laissent dans l’ombre le processus de remise en couple, plus ou moins long selon les caractéristiques de l’union précédente. Les données de l’enquête Étude des parcours individuels et conjugaux (Épic, Ined-Insee, 2013-2014) retracent l’histoire conjugale des personnes interrogées en distinguant les périodes de non-cohabitation des périodes cohabitantes. En utilisant des fonctions de survie et des modèles de durée, certains freins à l’emménagement sous le même toit sont identifiés, en particulier pour les femmes, comme la présence d’enfants à charge, le fait d’avoir été marié ou d’avoir vécu une séparation conflictuelle. Un âge avancé à la remise en couple réduit par ailleurs la probabilité de vivre ensemble. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Conjugality in France has seen a number of changes over recent decades. First, we are witnessing diversified forms of unions beyond the ‘standard’ norm of marriage, such as cohabitation outside marriage, PACS (civil union), and non-cohabiting relationships. Second, intimate relationship trajectories are increasingly marked by discontinuity, with separations and repartnering occurring more frequently. Based on these observations, this article explores the present diversification and discontinuity by looking at the link between past conjugal history and the form taken by the subsequent union, i.e. whether cohabiting or not. Most studies on repartnering approach the subject solely through the prism of living together while overlooking non-cohabiting relationships as a separate form of union, thus shedding no light on the repartnering process, which may take varying amounts of time that depend on the characteristics of the previous union. Using data from the EPIC survey on individual and conjugal trajectories (Étude des parcours individuels et conjugaux, INED–INSEE, 2013–2014), we trace the conjugal histories of the respondents by distinguishing between periods of non-cohabitation and cohabitation. Using survival functions and duration models, certain impediments to moving in together are identified—some of which are particularly prominent for women, such as the presence of dependent children, having been married, and having experienced a highly conflictive separation. Increased age at the time of repartnering also reduces the probability of living together. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Resumen La pareja ha conocido numerosas evoluciones en Francia. Asistimos, por un lado, a una diversificación de las formas de unión (matrimonio, cohabitación sin matrimonio, Pacs, relación sin cohabitación) y, por otro lado, a la discontinuidad del recorrido amoroso, caracterizado por separaciones y por retornos a la vida de pareja más frecuentes. A partir de esta doble constatación, este artículo estudia la relación entre la historia de la vida conyugal pasada y la forma, con cohabitación o no, que toma la unión siguiente. La mayoría de los estudios sobre el retorno a la vida de pareja, lo hacen bajo el solo prisma de la vida en común, ocultando así la conyugalidad sin cohabitación como forma de unión plena y dejando en la sombra el proceso de retorno a la vida de pareja, más o menos largo según las características de la unión precedente. Los datos de la encuesta EPIC Estudio de las trayectorias individuales y conyugales (Étude des parcours individuels et conjugaux , Ined-Insee, 2013-2014) describen la historia conyugal de los entrevistados distinguiendo los periodos de cohabitación de los periodos sin cohabitación. Utilizando funciones de supervivencia y modelos de duración, ciertos frenos a la vuelta a la vida común son identificados, en particular en las mujeres, como la presencia de hijos a cargo, el hecho de haber estado casado o el de haber sufrido una separación conflictiva. Una edad avanzada reduce también la probabilidad de un retorno a la vida común. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | séparation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | couple |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Épic |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cohabitation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | histoire conjugale |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | couple non cohabitant |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | France |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Living Apart Together |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | remise en couple |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | repartnering |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | couple |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | EPIC |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | conjugal history |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | non-cohabiting couple |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cohabitation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | separation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | France |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Living Apart Together |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Population | 74 | 1 | 2019-07-01 | p. 73-102 | 0032-4663 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-population-2019-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-population-2019-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux