Les transactions partenariales dans les interstices de l'action sociale (notice n° 794782)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04465cam a2200385 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123120346.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Lyet, Philippe |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Les transactions partenariales dans les interstices de l'action sociale |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 86 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | RésuméCet article présente une analyse de projets partenariaux qui se caractérisent par le fait qu’ils sont coconstruits. Leur mise en œuvre conduit les acteurs à mettre en place un collectif régulateur qui se voit reconnaître une légitimité par les acteurs les plus proches de l’action. On peut parler ici d’un processus instituant de type endogène-ascendant. Celui-ci se fonde prioritairement sur l’engagement des individus les uns vis-à-vis des autres et sur la conscience de leur interdépendance. Si cette forme d’institution (au sens de processus) est minimale et précaire sous certains aspects, elle n’en est pas moins forte pour ses membres et sa force s’ancre dans la force des liens qui unissent différents partenaires et qui tient à leur identité plurielle et à leur capacité à métisser leur logique avec celles d’autres intervenants. Ces processus sont analysés à l’aide du concept de transaction sociale, proposé par Jean Remy (in Freynet, 1998). Celui-ci permet en particulier de comprendre comment des acteurs peuvent : 1. Pallier l’absence de cadre institué par la construction d’un cadre procédural minimal qui construit et garantit la transaction et qui se manifeste par des règles négociées et stabilisées sur la base d’une articulation des intérêts des membres du collectif. 2. Procéder à la mise en équivalence de « richesses symboliques » initialement incomparables parce que produites dans des segments sociaux différents et qui conduisent à la formulation d’un accord sur les valeurs et les conceptions qui fondent l’action et à l’émergence d’une situation de confiance réciproque. 3. Redéfinir d’une manière mutuellement acceptée leurs identités sociales dans le cadre de la construction de ce nouvel espace d’interactions sociales. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article presents an analysis of partner projects characterised by their co-building. In their implementation, the actors have to set up a regulation collective that gets legitimacy from the actors who are the closest to the action. We can speak here of an instituting process of the ascending-endogenous type. The latest is based in priority on the commitment of the individuals for each other and on the consciousness of their interdependence. If this form of instituting is minimal and precarious under some aspects, it is not weaker for its members and its strength is rooted in the strength of the links between different partners that is attached to their plural identity and their capacity to cross their logic with those of other interveners.These processes are analysed with the help of the concept of social transaction, proposed by Jean REMY. It allows us in particular to understand how the actors can: 1. Overcome the absence of frame instituted by the building of a minimal procedural frame that builds and guarantees the transaction and shows itself in rules that are negotiated and stabilized on the basis of an articulation of the interests of the members of the collective; 2. put in equivalence “symbolic riches” which were impossible to compare at first because they were produced in different social segments, which leads to formulating an agreement on the values and the conceptions that found the action at the birth of a reciprocal trust situation; 3. Redefine in a mutually accepted way their social identities in the frame of the building of that new space of social interactions. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | collaboration |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | organisation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | traduction |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | gouvernance |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | institution |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | identité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pouvoir |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | partenariat |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | transaction |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | identity |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | collaboration |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | governance |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | institution |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | power |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | transaction |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | partnership |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | organization |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | translation |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Pensée plurielle | 24 | 2 | 2010-09-21 | p. 13-30 | 1376-0963 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-pensee-plurielle-2010-2-page-13?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-pensee-plurielle-2010-2-page-13?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux