Science, décision et acceptabilité sociale (notice n° 821146)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 04950cam a2200469 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250123132356.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Fleury, Béatrice |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Science, décision et acceptabilité sociale |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 73 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Often described as a ‘total social event’, the Covid-19 pandemic has aroused –and continues to– the scientific community’s interest, led by medicine and public health. Solicited by authorities in charge of crisis managing, researchers are playing their part in a game of influence that inevitably raises questions about the relationship between science and politics, decision-making and social acceptability. Caroline Ollivier-Yaniv, a researcher in information and communication sciences and an observer and analyst of public policy, has taken up this issue in this section of ‘Exchanges’. In it, she explores the topic at stake in institutional communication’s discourse and practices on public health. Among the observations, she notices that public authorities do not pay enough attention to research in the human and social sciences, even though such research is likely to reveal mechanisms at work in institutional games and the damaging role they play in the fight against the pandemic. To discuss her arguments, six researchers from different disciplinary traditions take the floor in three stimulating contributions: the political scientist Gwenola Le Naour; the sociologists Étienne Nouguez and Anne Moyal; the sociologist and lawyer Corinne Gendron, the political scientist and communicologist Stéphanie Yates, and the administrative science researcher Alice Friser. Each, in his or her own way, extends or even counters the thesis put forward by C. Ollivier-Yaniv. The discussants thus qualify or refute the doxic dimension of social acceptability, by theorising what can be considered as a concept and by drawing on their own research to support the argument empirically. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Souvent qualifiée de « fait social total », la pandémie de Covid-19 a suscité – et suscite – l’intérêt des mondes scientifiques, avec en tête ceux de la médecine et de la santé publique. Sollicités par les autorités en charge de la gestion de la crise, les chercheurs participent de la sorte d’un jeu d’influence qui ne peut qu’interroger les relations entre science et politique, décision et acceptabilité sociale. C’est Caroline Ollivier-Yaniv, chercheuse en sciences de l’information et de la communication, observatrice et analyste des politiques publiques, qui s’est emparée de cette problématique dans les présents « Échanges ». Elle y explore les enjeux des discours et pratiques de communication institutionnelle au sujet de la santé publique. Parmi les constats qu’elle pose, elle note la place insuffisante qui est accordée par les pouvoirs publics aux recherches en sciences humaines et sociales, quand bien même celles-ci sont-elles susceptibles de démonter les mécanismes à l’œuvre dans les jeux institutionnels et le rôle préjudiciable de ces derniers dans la lutte contre la pandémie. Pour discuter ses arguments, six chercheurs de plusieurs traditions disciplinaires prennent la parole dans trois contributions stimulantes : la politiste Gwenola Le Naour ; les sociologues Étienne Nouguez et Anne Moyal ; la sociologue et avocate Corinne Gendron, la politiste et communicologue Stéphanie Yates, ainsi que la chercheuse en science administrative Alice Friser. Chacun et chacune, à sa façon, prolonge, voire prend le contrepied de la thèse avancée par C. Ollivier-Yaniv. Ainsi discutant ou discutantes nuancent voire réfutent la dimension doxique de l’acceptabilité sociale, en théorisant ce qui peut être considéré comme un concept et en puisant dans leurs recherches afin d’étayer empiriquement le propos. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | espace public |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | politique nationale centralisée |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | science |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | territoires |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | initiative locale |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | connaissances |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | sciences humaines et sociales |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | acceptabilité sociale |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | gestion des risques |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | universalisme |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | instrumentalisation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | knowledge |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | science |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | public space |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | local initiative |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | social acceptability |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | centralised national policy |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | territories |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | instrumentalisation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | human and social sciences |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | risk management |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | universalism |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Walter, Jacques |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Questions de communication | 45 | 1 | 2024-11-07 | p. 161-172 | 1633-5961 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-questions-de-communication-2024-1-page-161?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-questions-de-communication-2024-1-page-161?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux