Incentives and manipulability in Choice Modeling. Some experimental results (notice n° 834291)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02358cam a2200277 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250123140111.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Riera, Pere |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Incentives and manipulability in Choice Modeling. Some experimental results |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2015.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 3 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Les études monétaires peuvent être analysées sous différents angles, dont celui de l’incitation. Même si les individus ont parfois intérêt à agir stratégiquement, ils ne vont pas forcément agir ainsi. La propension à adopter ce type de comportement peut être testée en laboratoire. La méthode des choix multi-attributs a été peu utilisée dans cette optique, comparée à la méthode d’évaluation contingente. Cet article utilise la technique du groupement contingent qui est une variante du choix multi-attributs. La conclusion principale de cet article est que les individus ne vont pas agir stratégiquement quand le mécanisme de manipulation est compliqué à déceler – à moins qu’on ne le leur explique au préalable. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | From a mechanism design perspective, a valuation exercise can be analyzed in terms of its incentive compatibility. However, a non-incentive compatible exercise does not automatically imply that participants will engage in strategic behavior. The likelihood of this behavior can be tested through lab experiments. In this regard, choice modeling has received little attention compared to the contingent valuation method. This article reports a laboratory experiment using contingent grouping, a choice modeling valuation variant. The main conclusion is that the manipulability of this type of valuation exercises may be too difficult to realize by the participants to behave strategically – unless they are made aware in advance. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Incitation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | choix multi-attributs |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | groupement contingent |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | évaluation contingente |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Incentive compatibility |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | choice experiment |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | contingent grouping |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | contingent valuation |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Manrique, Olga Lucia |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Revue d'économie politique | 125 | 2 | 2015-06-10 | p. 197-207 | 0373-2630 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2015-2-page-197?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2015-2-page-197?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux