Transatlantic Free Trade Agreements : Lack of EU Leadership for Reforming Trade and Investment Law ? (notice n° 874641)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02301cam a2200217 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250123160852.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Transatlantic Free Trade Agreements : Lack of EU Leadership for Reforming Trade and Investment Law ? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2017.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 69 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Should the EU design transatlantic free trade agreements (FTAs) as a power-oriented “international law among states”, a “democratic law among peoples”, or as a “cosmopolitan law among individuals” as the legitimate “constituent powers” and “democratic principals” of all governance agents in the 21st century ? Why are fundamental rights so important for reforming “disconnected UN/WTO governance” so as to render multilevel protection of transnational public goods (PGs) more effective for the benefit of citizens ? FTAs protecting rights and remedies of citizens have been uniquely successful in European integration, for instance by limiting “governance failures” and “market failures” (e.g. through constitutional, competition, labour, social and environmental law and judicial remedies). Yet, the EU neglects its “cosmopolitan foreign policy mandate” in FTA negotiations with non-European countries. European citizens criticize transatlantic FTAs for disregarding fundamental rights and judicial remedies inside the EU. Rather than exercising leadership as a “protector of citizens” in the necessary reforms of “disconnected UN/WTO governance” of transnational PGs by designing FTAs among democracies as “cosmopolitan international law”, the EU institutions prioritize bureaucratic self-interests in reducing legal, democratic and judicial accountability vis-à-vis citizens in the trade policy area, thereby aggravating the EU’s legitimacy – and rule-of-law-crises. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | constitutionalism |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | public goods |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cosmopolitan law |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | free trade agreements |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | EU Charter of Fundamental Rights |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue internationale de droit économique | t. XXX | 4 | 2017-04-04 | p. 455-480 | 1010-8831 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2016-4-page-455?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2016-4-page-455?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux