Paradigmas historiográficos de la Antigüedad tardía: de Gibbon a la (vieja) New Late Antiquity (notice n° 913009)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02362cam a2200229 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250125011737.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Villegas Marín, Raúl |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Paradigmas historiográficos de la Antigüedad tardía: de Gibbon a la (vieja) New Late Antiquity |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2022.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 99 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Although Gibbon continues to be widely recognized as an exceptional historian, as well as a magnificent writer, few historians of late antiquity today share the interpretive paradigm of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Authors such as Peter Brown and Henri-Irenée Marrou successfully combated the "decadentist prejudice" when approaching the study of Late Antiquity. If we had to summarize in a single term the predominant interpretive paradigm in our days in the study of this period, it would be that of “continuity”: continuity (at the administrative, legal, cultural levels, etc.) between the post-imperial kingdoms of the Latin West and the imperial precedent and also continuity between Christian culture (popular culture and culture of the Fathers of the Church) and Greco-Roman culture. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Pese a que Gibbon sigue siendo ampliamente reconocido como un historiador excepcional, además de como un escritor magnífico, pocos historiadores de la Antigüedad tardía comparten hoy el paradigma interpretativo del decline and fall del Imperio romano. Autores como Peter Brown y Henri-Irenée Marrou combatieron con éxito el “prejuicio decadentista” a la hora de abordar el estudio de la Antigüedad tardía. Si tuviéramos que resumir en un solo término el paradigma interpretativo predominante en nuestros días en el estudio de este período, este sería el de “continuidad”: continuidad (en los niveles administrativo, jurídico, cultural, etc.) entre los reinos post-imperiales del Occidente latino y el precedente imperial y continuidad también entre la cultura cristiana (cultura popular y cultura de los Padres de la Iglesia) y la cultura grecorromana. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Late Antiquity |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Empire |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Christianity |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Decline |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | continuity |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Araucaria | 51 | 3 | 2022-11-01 | p. 653-666 | 1575-6823 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revista-araucaria-2022-3-page-653?lang=es&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revista-araucaria-2022-3-page-653?lang=es&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux