Évaluation des pratiques de diagnostic de stress au sein d'entreprises belges : facteurs bloquants et facteurs stimulants (notice n° 991331)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 06150cam a2200301 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250125131337.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Hansez, Isabelle |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Évaluation des pratiques de diagnostic de stress au sein d'entreprises belges : facteurs bloquants et facteurs stimulants |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2009.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 53 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | EVALUATION OF STRESS DIAGNOSIS PRACTICES IN BELGIAN COMPANIES : BLOCKING AND STIMULATING FACTORS Over the last decade, stress at work has become a major problem in Europe. A European and national legal framework has been developed and several methods for stress diagnosis and stress management intervention have been identified. Within this context, it is necessary to carry out a systematic examination of diagnosis practices and interventions that take place in companies. The objectives of the study were : 1 / the evaluation of work stress diagnosis practices in Belgian companies, and 2 / the identification of factors that stimulate or block the implementation of stress management interventions. A survey was used to collect data about work stress diagnosis practices. The first objective was explored through qualitative open questions about stress diagnosis and intervention. The second objective was achieved using a specific questionnaire, which was elaborated for the purpose of the study. Based on a review of the scientific literature, this questionnaire assessed the stimulating and blocking factors for implementing stress management interventions. The sample includes 180 Belgian companies of different sizes (from 20 to more than 10,000 workers) and from different sectors of activity. Only one out of six companies had implemented a stress diagnosis. Among those who had done so, only one out of two had implemented actions, and only one out of four had moved onto an evaluation stage. Stimulating factors related to the methodology implemented and the communication process were identified, as well as blocking factors relating to financial and temporal constraints, and the context of change in the company. The latter is a relatively new factor with regard to the existing literature. The discussion includes four points of analysis. The interventions which are implemented are clearly concerned with the primary approach that focuses on the work environment. Secondly, the results support the necessity for a systematic evaluation process of stress management interventions. Moreover, the results offer evidence of a need for sensitisation and publication of best practices about the necessary stages in the stress prevention process, as well as about stimulating and blocking factors. This holds especially true for small-size companies which carry out fewer diagnoses than larger ones. It is also important for companies which are not yet involved in stress diagnosis, and those that are less aware of the impact of financial and temporal constraints. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | EVALUATION OF STRESS DIAGNOSIS PRACTICES IN BELGIAN COMPANIES : BLOCKING AND STIMULATING FACTORS Over the last decade, stress at work has become a major problem in Europe. A European and national legal framework has been developed and several methods for stress diagnosis and stress management intervention have been identified. Within this context, it is necessary to carry out a systematic examination of diagnosis practices and interventions that take place in companies. The objectives of the study were : 1 / the evaluation of work stress diagnosis practices in Belgian companies, and 2 / the identification of factors that stimulate or block the implementation of stress management interventions. A survey was used to collect data about work stress diagnosis practices. The first objective was explored through qualitative open questions about stress diagnosis and intervention. The second objective was achieved using a specific questionnaire, which was elaborated for the purpose of the study. Based on a review of the scientific literature, this questionnaire assessed the stimulating and blocking factors for implementing stress management interventions. The sample includes 180 Belgian companies of different sizes (from 20 to more than 10,000 workers) and from different sectors of activity. Only one out of six companies had implemented a stress diagnosis. Among those who had done so, only one out of two had implemented actions, and only one out of four had moved onto an evaluation stage. Stimulating factors related to the methodology implemented and the communication process were identified, as well as blocking factors relating to financial and temporal constraints, and the context of change in the company. The latter is a relatively new factor with regard to the existing literature. The discussion includes four points of analysis. The interventions which are implemented are clearly concerned with the primary approach that focuses on the work environment. Secondly, the results support the necessity for a systematic evaluation process of stress management interventions. Moreover, the results offer evidence of a need for sensitisation and publication of best practices about the necessary stages in the stress prevention process, as well as about stimulating and blocking factors. This holds especially true for small-size companies which carry out fewer diagnoses than larger ones. It is also important for companies which are not yet involved in stress diagnosis, and those that are less aware of the impact of financial and temporal constraints. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Prévention du stress |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Diagnostic de stress |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Évaluation des pratiques |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Stress professionnel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Stress at work |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Practice evaluation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Stress prevention |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Stress diagnosis |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Occupational stress |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bertrand, Françoise |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Barbier, Marie |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Le travail humain | 72 | 2 | 2009-06-02 | p. 127-153 | 0041-1868 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-le-travail-humain-2009-2-page-127?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-le-travail-humain-2009-2-page-127?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux