Front matter
Type de matériel :
TexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2025.
Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : This article examines the main determinants of coups d’État in developing countries, given the uncertainty in choosing potential explanatory factors. The Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is applied to a sample of 95 countries. The analysis identifies five key factors influencing the occurrence and success of coups d’État on a global scale: the number of major constitutional changes, acts of revolution, the added value of the agricultural sector, multipartyism, and the level of education. Robustness tests demonstrate that, in addition to the impact of constitutional changes and acts of revolution, military coups are influenced by government size, the added value of the agricultural sector, the military role of the Minister of Defense, and opposition fragmentation. In contrast, civil coups shed light on factors such as the level of education, government crises, and democracy. Some factors vary following the geographical and colonial context. The results lend support to the notion that constitutional changes can potentially explain the occurrence of coups d’État in Africa, although these effects tend to diminish within a year. In America, the level of inflation, economic freedom, corruption, the age of the ruling party, and the spatial distribution of conflicts emerge as significant factors. The analysis using alternative methods GETS and LASSO confirms the decisive nature of constitutional changes and acts of revolution as determinants of the occurrence of coups d’État.
99
This article examines the main determinants of coups d’État in developing countries, given the uncertainty in choosing potential explanatory factors. The Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is applied to a sample of 95 countries. The analysis identifies five key factors influencing the occurrence and success of coups d’État on a global scale: the number of major constitutional changes, acts of revolution, the added value of the agricultural sector, multipartyism, and the level of education. Robustness tests demonstrate that, in addition to the impact of constitutional changes and acts of revolution, military coups are influenced by government size, the added value of the agricultural sector, the military role of the Minister of Defense, and opposition fragmentation. In contrast, civil coups shed light on factors such as the level of education, government crises, and democracy. Some factors vary following the geographical and colonial context. The results lend support to the notion that constitutional changes can potentially explain the occurrence of coups d’État in Africa, although these effects tend to diminish within a year. In America, the level of inflation, economic freedom, corruption, the age of the ruling party, and the spatial distribution of conflicts emerge as significant factors. The analysis using alternative methods GETS and LASSO confirms the decisive nature of constitutional changes and acts of revolution as determinants of the occurrence of coups d’État.




Réseaux sociaux