92

RésuméAprès avoir présenté les principales caractéristiques de l’analyse collective du travail ( act), une méthode d’analyse du travail dans laquelle des travailleurs, en groupe, analysent leur propre travail, l’auteure reprend une comparaison faite par elle en 1997 entre la psychodynamique du travail ( pdt) et l’analyse collective du travail. Elle propose une analyse comparative selon trois niveaux : celui des idées, celui des résultats et celui de l’interprétation des résultats. Elle est amenée à conclure que les points de convergence entre les deux démarches sont nombreux et attire l’attention sur certains points qui, selon elle, demanderaient à être approfondis, comme les concepts de « travail » et d’« organisation du travail ».

After presenting the main features of collective work analysis (Analyse collective du travail, act), the method of which consists of the analysis of their own work by workers as a group, the author uses a comparison, suggested by her in 1997, of the psychodynamics of work with the collective work analysis. She builds a comparative analysis on three level: the level of ideas, the level of results and the level of results’ interpretation. She is led to conclude that the two approaches have several things in common and she draws attention to some of these things, which, according to her, require to be examined in more details, like the concept of “work” and of “work organisation”.

ResumoDepois de apresentar as principais características da Análise Coletiva do Trabalho ( act), um método de análise do trabalho no qual trabalhadores, em grupo, analisam seu próprio trabalho, a autora tenta repetir uma comparação já feita em 1997 entre a Psicodinâmica do Trabalho ( pdt) e a act, agora em três níveis: o das idéias, o dos resultados e o das interpretações dos resultados. Conclui que as convergências entre ambas são muitas, mas aponta alguns pontos que precisariam, a seu ver, ser mais aprofundados, como os conceitos de ‘trabalho’ e de‘organização do trabalho’.