31

The relationship of the body to the mind has always been a very sensitive subject in the field of psychoanalysis. It is very often surrounded by an air of suspicion, the taboo of touch, the flames of arousal and unbridled impulses, the risk of taking action, the struggle of avoiding deliberate thinking, the fear of being enslaved to bodily functions and the challenges of self-preservation and the ability to re-adapt. It is far removed from the theories of individual freedom (in a psychoanalytic sense) and unconscious logic. The psychoanalytic theory tried to analyse the issue through the various sphincter functions, the protective skin and the marks on it that assess the ego’s needs for metaphorization and self-representation. Thus, the psyche 'speaks’ through the body long before being capable of verbal communication. Needless to say, the opposite - the control of the psyche by the body- is also worth noting, even though research has not yet shown much interest in exploring the relationship between the suffering of the body and its psychological manifestations (pain, disability, developmental disorders, psychomotor impairments, etc.). There is also a lot to say about the different ways the body can interfere with an individual’s psychological life, such as body movements, motoricity, tonus, (sensorial) sensitivity and last, but not least, its ability to relate, person to person. Here is an attempt to start building an analytic theory of the relational body that would take into account the multiple ways the body can connect to the psyche and vice versa, or to be more exact, how someone’s body-psyche unit can connect to someone else’s. For no psyche-related question about any individual can be answered without considering the surrounding of others psyche’s. . .the latter themselves being highly connected in a physical sense.