Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Enquête sur l’édition originale de Sertorius de Corneille (1662) : « D’où me vient ce désordre…? »

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2014. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : In his Bibliographie cornélienne (1876) Émile Picot describes two original editions of Sertorius, a tragedy by Pierre Corneille: number 80 and number 81, which are distinguished not only by the number of pages (95 pages for number 80 and 82 pages for number 81) but also by minor variations in the booksellers’ address on the title page, and additional or missing words in the colophon. Since Émile Picot does not point out those variations, in 1888 the bibliographer Jules Le Petit, who had not seen number 80, would describe and illustrate the two editions as if they had the same title page. In 1928, Avenir Tchermezine, who had not found number 80 either nor paid attention to the variations noted by Picot, would merely reproduce the photograph of number 81’s title page in presenting the two editions, installing thus the long-standing confusion between numbers 80 and 81. The recent discovery of two copies of number 80, one in the Casanatense Library in Rome, the other in the Bibliothèque Romain-Gary in Nice, proves not only that the two editions are different, but that number 80 is a Grenoble counterfeit from the shop of Philippe Charvys. Only number 81 corresponds to the original edition of Sertorius, printed in Rouen by Laurent Maurry in 1662.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

70

In his Bibliographie cornélienne (1876) Émile Picot describes two original editions of Sertorius, a tragedy by Pierre Corneille: number 80 and number 81, which are distinguished not only by the number of pages (95 pages for number 80 and 82 pages for number 81) but also by minor variations in the booksellers’ address on the title page, and additional or missing words in the colophon. Since Émile Picot does not point out those variations, in 1888 the bibliographer Jules Le Petit, who had not seen number 80, would describe and illustrate the two editions as if they had the same title page. In 1928, Avenir Tchermezine, who had not found number 80 either nor paid attention to the variations noted by Picot, would merely reproduce the photograph of number 81’s title page in presenting the two editions, installing thus the long-standing confusion between numbers 80 and 81. The recent discovery of two copies of number 80, one in the Casanatense Library in Rome, the other in the Bibliothèque Romain-Gary in Nice, proves not only that the two editions are different, but that number 80 is a Grenoble counterfeit from the shop of Philippe Charvys. Only number 81 corresponds to the original edition of Sertorius, printed in Rouen by Laurent Maurry in 1662.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025