Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

The "0.7%" myth: The origins and relevance of the international aid target

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2006. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : What is the right amount of development aid? The international aim for rich countries to devote 0.7% of GNI to aid has become the accepted answer in many official quarters and a cause c?l?bre for aid activists. The origins of the target, however, raise serious questions about its relevance. First, the 0.7% target was calculated using a series of assumptions that are no longer true, and justified by a model that is no longer considered credible. Using essentially the same method but with today's conditions yields a goal of just 0.01%. We do not claim by any means that this is the "right" amount of aid, but only that this exercise lays bare the folly of the initial method and the subsequent unreflective commitment to the 0.7% aid goal. Second, we document that, despite frequent misinterpretation, no government ever agreed in a UN forum to actually reach 0.7% 'though many pledged to move toward it. Third, we argue that ODA/GNI does not constitute a meaningful metric for the adequacy of aid flows. The 0.7% target began life as a lobbying tool, and effective or not, stretching it to become a functional target no longer makes any sense, if it ever did.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

4

What is the right amount of development aid? The international aim for rich countries to devote 0.7% of GNI to aid has become the accepted answer in many official quarters and a cause c?l?bre for aid activists. The origins of the target, however, raise serious questions about its relevance. First, the 0.7% target was calculated using a series of assumptions that are no longer true, and justified by a model that is no longer considered credible. Using essentially the same method but with today's conditions yields a goal of just 0.01%. We do not claim by any means that this is the "right" amount of aid, but only that this exercise lays bare the folly of the initial method and the subsequent unreflective commitment to the 0.7% aid goal. Second, we document that, despite frequent misinterpretation, no government ever agreed in a UN forum to actually reach 0.7% 'though many pledged to move toward it. Third, we argue that ODA/GNI does not constitute a meaningful metric for the adequacy of aid flows. The 0.7% target began life as a lobbying tool, and effective or not, stretching it to become a functional target no longer makes any sense, if it ever did.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025