The contemporary rehabilitation of Canguilhem as a philosopher: A context of dispute
Type de matériel :
TexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2024.
Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Recent studies about Georges Canguilhem have repeatedly emphasized the philosophical nature of his work. They assert that our acknowledgment of Canguilhem’s philosophy is quite new, and has been delayed by a misconception of his work, which had been perceived as primarily belonging to the fields of history of science or epistemology. In this article, I examine the import of this assertion. How did Canguilhem’s philosophy come to be forgotten? I show that this surprising claim cannot be understood without taking into account a context of academic debate, in France and abroad, regarding the definition of the philosophy of science.
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document
80
Recent studies about Georges Canguilhem have repeatedly emphasized the philosophical nature of his work. They assert that our acknowledgment of Canguilhem’s philosophy is quite new, and has been delayed by a misconception of his work, which had been perceived as primarily belonging to the fields of history of science or epistemology. In this article, I examine the import of this assertion. How did Canguilhem’s philosophy come to be forgotten? I show that this surprising claim cannot be understood without taking into account a context of academic debate, in France and abroad, regarding the definition of the philosophy of science.
Réseaux sociaux