Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Destructive ambiguity: How internal divisions blurred the Labour Party’s positioning on Brexit (2016-2019)

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2023. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : The negotiation period that followed the aftermath of the 2016 Brexit referendum was marked by significant political instability in the United Kingdom. In this context, major divisions within the Conservative Party could have created opportunities for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party. However, the strategy of “constructive ambiguity” that Labour adopted was eventually a failure, ending in resounding electoral defeat in 2019. This article analyses the choices made by the party in this context, considering both party elites and grassroots activists, based on qualitative data collected on both of these levels of the organisation. It shows that the leadership’s control over the party was highly dependent on both a precarious coalition of organisational actors and support from the members. Disagreements within the party – including among Corbyn’s supporters – meant that taking a clear stance either for or against a second Brexit referendum could have jeopardised Corbyn’s position. Ambiguity was thus seen as the only way to keep the party united around its leader.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

24

The negotiation period that followed the aftermath of the 2016 Brexit referendum was marked by significant political instability in the United Kingdom. In this context, major divisions within the Conservative Party could have created opportunities for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party. However, the strategy of “constructive ambiguity” that Labour adopted was eventually a failure, ending in resounding electoral defeat in 2019. This article analyses the choices made by the party in this context, considering both party elites and grassroots activists, based on qualitative data collected on both of these levels of the organisation. It shows that the leadership’s control over the party was highly dependent on both a precarious coalition of organisational actors and support from the members. Disagreements within the party – including among Corbyn’s supporters – meant that taking a clear stance either for or against a second Brexit referendum could have jeopardised Corbyn’s position. Ambiguity was thus seen as the only way to keep the party united around its leader.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025