Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Local action and rural development: The diversity of the forms of appropriation of the European LEADER program in France and Lithuania

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2018. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Between 2007 and 2013, the European Rural Development Policy targets were supported by the LEADER program, an instrument that can be interpreted differently according to each country. Based on the examples of France and Lithuania, we study the way in which the institutional organization of the system at a local level helps us to understand the stakeholders system and how adaptable it is to situations in each of the corresponding countries and project areas. A comparative approach, based on a joint methodology of investigation and analysis, was used on four project areas: Joniškis and Ignalina in Lithuania, and Gévaudan-Lozère and Pays Cœur d’Hérault in France. It shows that, in all cases, a form of “municipalization” of the LEADER program, or at least a strong integration of the association sector, is dominant and seems to be established. Studying the network of stakeholders helps to identify the inter-knowledge, as well as the relationships of interdependency that lie at the heart of the system. The development of the “social capital of individuals” is often an entry point, if not a cornerstone, of the system of stakeholders in place. Finally, it is through the analysis of the project selection process that we can truly grasp the characteristics of the new public action mode, in particular by studying the allocation of projects in these local areas.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

74

Between 2007 and 2013, the European Rural Development Policy targets were supported by the LEADER program, an instrument that can be interpreted differently according to each country. Based on the examples of France and Lithuania, we study the way in which the institutional organization of the system at a local level helps us to understand the stakeholders system and how adaptable it is to situations in each of the corresponding countries and project areas. A comparative approach, based on a joint methodology of investigation and analysis, was used on four project areas: Joniškis and Ignalina in Lithuania, and Gévaudan-Lozère and Pays Cœur d’Hérault in France. It shows that, in all cases, a form of “municipalization” of the LEADER program, or at least a strong integration of the association sector, is dominant and seems to be established. Studying the network of stakeholders helps to identify the inter-knowledge, as well as the relationships of interdependency that lie at the heart of the system. The development of the “social capital of individuals” is often an entry point, if not a cornerstone, of the system of stakeholders in place. Finally, it is through the analysis of the project selection process that we can truly grasp the characteristics of the new public action mode, in particular by studying the allocation of projects in these local areas.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025