62

As a psychic experience, exile involves an indeterminacy of belonging and fate. Even if only understood from the angle of migration, exile engages the fundamental signifiers of the subject, upsets the links with others, brings into play the question of origins, challenges the meaning that is at the base of acts of transmission, and gives a new direction to transmission between generations. Consequently, the interculturation of immigrant children cannot be envisaged without taking into account the educational representations of parents, the content of family transmissions, and at the same time the effects of wider socialization. Three situations given as examples demonstrate that both family experience and the context of socialization contribute to the construction of unique trajectories, undoubtedly marked by the parents’ experiences of exile, but also forged to a very large extent by the available opportunities for adaptation-integration. Everything indicates that the process of transmitting memories of exile is not always explicit and that it also draws on experiences of socialization in a “categorial” society with a difficult relationship to immigration.