40

This article addresses the question of a “liturgical anthropology” not as an “integration” of sacramental theology but as a reformulation of all of theology in a way that is more faithful to its original intention. To do so, it rereads the contribution of the Liturgical Movement that confers greater value on “phenomena”, “sensibility”, “non-verbal language” and generally speaking on the “contingent exteriorization” of signs. This involves a “fundamental translation of the tradition” of the Latin Church, which continues to be profoundly marked by an overly abstract logic of the indispensable minimum and that, in the long term, neglects to pay due attention to celebration. This focus has important consequences at the pastoral and ecumenical levels.