“Structural” domination? How republicanism is grappling with economic and social inequalities
Type de matériel :
TexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2023.
Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Neo-republicanism defines freedom not as the absence of interference but as the absence of domination. By domination, it means personal domination, that is, that which an agent or group of agents intentionally exercises over another agent or group of agents. But, in our societies, can’t we find dominations without agents, dominations which are sometimes called “structural” because they arise from the asymmetrical structure of property rights? Drawing on the work of Philip Pettit, Alex Gourevitch and Sharon Krause, the article challenges the republican definition of domination and, therefore, that of the emancipation that citizens can expect in a truly free society.
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document
70
Neo-republicanism defines freedom not as the absence of interference but as the absence of domination. By domination, it means personal domination, that is, that which an agent or group of agents intentionally exercises over another agent or group of agents. But, in our societies, can’t we find dominations without agents, dominations which are sometimes called “structural” because they arise from the asymmetrical structure of property rights? Drawing on the work of Philip Pettit, Alex Gourevitch and Sharon Krause, the article challenges the republican definition of domination and, therefore, that of the emancipation that citizens can expect in a truly free society.
Réseaux sociaux