Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Authoritative good practice or recovery? The example of traumatic diagnoses in psychiatry

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2024. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : In 2022, the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de la Santé) issued a recommendation concerning the announcement of a “severe psychiatric diagnosis” to an adult “patient,” insisting on the caution to be taken and emphasizing the active participation of the “patient” in this process. In this article, we analyze some of the paradoxical aspects of this recommendation: the contrast between its ambition for practice and the actual situation in French psychiatry, the essentialization of a “co-constructed” diagnosis, the demand for truthfulness with regard to the “patient” accompanied by the trivialization of the traumatic potential of the “announcement” (e.g., in the patient's records), the assertion of the exclusively clinical nature of such a diagnosis according to a protocol that conflicts with the singular encounter between the person being cared for and his or her entourage. These paradoxes seem inherent to the situation of an authority placed in a position of supporting empowerment, which necessarily brings together those receiving care and those providing it.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

4

In 2022, the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de la Santé) issued a recommendation concerning the announcement of a “severe psychiatric diagnosis” to an adult “patient,” insisting on the caution to be taken and emphasizing the active participation of the “patient” in this process. In this article, we analyze some of the paradoxical aspects of this recommendation: the contrast between its ambition for practice and the actual situation in French psychiatry, the essentialization of a “co-constructed” diagnosis, the demand for truthfulness with regard to the “patient” accompanied by the trivialization of the traumatic potential of the “announcement” (e.g., in the patient's records), the assertion of the exclusively clinical nature of such a diagnosis according to a protocol that conflicts with the singular encounter between the person being cared for and his or her entourage. These paradoxes seem inherent to the situation of an authority placed in a position of supporting empowerment, which necessarily brings together those receiving care and those providing it.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025