Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

The Use of Aesthetic Prejudice as a Dreadful Tool of the Jew Stigmatization

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2013. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : This article examines in what way the “aesthetic dimension” of anti-Semitism was organized from the 19th century to the first half of 20th century. It aims at showing how the creation of a degrading representation of Jew, with anti-semitic posters, drawings and texts, was used as a support for all the other negative considerations and how physical ugliness, or at least what is considered as such to represent one other unworthiness, was used as a tool with the intention of profoundly marking consciousness. This analysis aims to establish from which elements a stigmatizing reading worked “as index and proof of a intrinsically revolting Jewish identity” (Taguieff, 2008, p. 213). However, considering the very significant number of studies devoted to anti-Semitism, one can wonder to what extent this research may generate any other contribution. Though, this interrogation does not seem vain if it is considered that appearance stigmatization was too often “underestimated to the benefit of its politics and religious dimensions” (Taguieff, 2008, p. 213) and that historians, sociologists and philosophers granted only a very few interest to the demeaning representation of Jew.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

5

This article examines in what way the “aesthetic dimension” of anti-Semitism was organized from the 19th century to the first half of 20th century. It aims at showing how the creation of a degrading representation of Jew, with anti-semitic posters, drawings and texts, was used as a support for all the other negative considerations and how physical ugliness, or at least what is considered as such to represent one other unworthiness, was used as a tool with the intention of profoundly marking consciousness. This analysis aims to establish from which elements a stigmatizing reading worked “as index and proof of a intrinsically revolting Jewish identity” (Taguieff, 2008, p. 213). However, considering the very significant number of studies devoted to anti-Semitism, one can wonder to what extent this research may generate any other contribution. Though, this interrogation does not seem vain if it is considered that appearance stigmatization was too often “underestimated to the benefit of its politics and religious dimensions” (Taguieff, 2008, p. 213) and that historians, sociologists and philosophers granted only a very few interest to the demeaning representation of Jew.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025