49

— The analytic encounter between the analyst and the analysand is at the heart of both D. Clerc and L. Danon-Boileau’s papers. Danon-Boileau’s paper constitutes an innovating conception of language and interpretation that accounts for the way in which transference and counter-transference are bound to the drive modalities of speech. Our hypothesis is that the latter refers back to the configuration of primary identifications and we subsequently propose the notions of interlocutor, internal witness, subjectivisation and multivocality in order to account for the dichotomy between the psychic and language apparatus and the springs of effective interpretation.