Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Quantitative and qualitative research methods: Can they coexist?

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2011. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Qualitative design is gaining ground in nursing research. In spite of relative progress, however, the evidence-based practice movement continues to dominate and to claim the exclusive value of quantitative design (particularly that of randomized clinical trials) for clinical decision making. In the present context—useful to those in power, making utilitarian decisions on one hand, and facing nursing criticism of the establishment in favor of qualitative research on the other—it is difficult to choose a practical and ethical path that values the nursing role within the health care system, keeping us committed to quality care and maintaining researchers’ integrity. Both qualitative and quantitative methods have advantages and disadvantages, and clearly, none can, by itself, capture, describe, and explain reality adequately. Therefore, a balance between the two methods is needed. Researchers bear a responsibility to society and science, and they should opt for the design which is appropriate for answering the research question, rather than the one favored by the research funding distributors.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

99

Qualitative design is gaining ground in nursing research. In spite of relative progress, however, the evidence-based practice movement continues to dominate and to claim the exclusive value of quantitative design (particularly that of randomized clinical trials) for clinical decision making. In the present context—useful to those in power, making utilitarian decisions on one hand, and facing nursing criticism of the establishment in favor of qualitative research on the other—it is difficult to choose a practical and ethical path that values the nursing role within the health care system, keeping us committed to quality care and maintaining researchers’ integrity. Both qualitative and quantitative methods have advantages and disadvantages, and clearly, none can, by itself, capture, describe, and explain reality adequately. Therefore, a balance between the two methods is needed. Researchers bear a responsibility to society and science, and they should opt for the design which is appropriate for answering the research question, rather than the one favored by the research funding distributors.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025