21

The philosophy of Suarez, in its implicit comparison with the legacies of Thomas More (1478−1535) and Madrigal (1410? − 1455), enables the identification of a double orientation at the heart of the constitution of political theory: the search for the best polity, for ideal government, for the best republic, which would take precedence in the order of well-being and that would be unsurpassed in nature, as a special space where social imagination would be practiced unfettered; and the endeavor aiming at establishing, not the best form of government but − relying on what people are − the condition of their improvement. It wouldn’t be so much a matter of theorizing about the best system of government than a matter of giving oneself the means of laying down the foundations of the most appropriate form of government, considering human nature. From this alternative, Suarez proposes to ponder over the question of the specific limits of all forms of political practice.