Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

A Critical Review of On the Run of Alice Goffman and its Public Reception

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2016. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : The publication of Alice Goffman’s book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City in the spring of 2014 initially aroused an enthusiastic reception that overflowed the university public and propelled its author to the rank of public intellectual, with a rare success among the public for a sociology book. The ethnographic investigation of Alice Goffman shows that the system of “hyper?policing” – instead of producing safer neighborhoods as it claims – leads to new forms of crime and undermines public safety and the social ties that people maintain with their families. However, the book is now the subject of controversy. Critics and defenders of the book discussed the credibility of Alice Goffman as a sociologist and the scientific nature of the ethnographic method, as well as of the collective responsibility of the social science research community for the quality of published research. After a presentation of the empirical investigation and of Alice Goffman’s main arguments, this article discusses the issues of the controversy that directly engage the political significance of the social sciences: Who can produce knowledge on what subject, and with what credibility?
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

40

The publication of Alice Goffman’s book On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City in the spring of 2014 initially aroused an enthusiastic reception that overflowed the university public and propelled its author to the rank of public intellectual, with a rare success among the public for a sociology book. The ethnographic investigation of Alice Goffman shows that the system of “hyper?policing” – instead of producing safer neighborhoods as it claims – leads to new forms of crime and undermines public safety and the social ties that people maintain with their families. However, the book is now the subject of controversy. Critics and defenders of the book discussed the credibility of Alice Goffman as a sociologist and the scientific nature of the ethnographic method, as well as of the collective responsibility of the social science research community for the quality of published research. After a presentation of the empirical investigation and of Alice Goffman’s main arguments, this article discusses the issues of the controversy that directly engage the political significance of the social sciences: Who can produce knowledge on what subject, and with what credibility?

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025