14

In this text, the author revisits her connection to the work of Sándor Ferenczi. By exploring the writings of certain psychoanalysts who openly acknowledge that they follow in Ferenczi’s footsteps, she shows that some others, even though their work might visibly acknowledge a debt to him, do not mention him explicitly, presumably as victims of the omerta to which this psychoanalyst was subjected for some fifty years. Claudine Blanchard-Laville shows how she herself was able to revisit her own link with this author through her knowledge of Michael Balint’s work and her use of Ferenczi’s 1932 text ‘Confusion de langue’, over and above the transmission she received from her analyst Salomon Resnik. Resnik never referred to his predecessor Ferenczi, even though his clinical attitude was very similar to Ferenczi’s and he himself often referred to the analysts who had come before him and given him inspiration. The article concludes with an evocation of the more recent work of psychoanalyst Philippe Réfabert, who openly links himself to Ferenczi after having analysed with other analysts certain elements present at the time of Sigmund Freud’s foundation of psychoanalysis that may have contributed to the subsequent erasure of Ferenczi’s work.