Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Testing of two systems for writing development in the school setting: Project vs workshop

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2016. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : How can we help pupils acquire the capacity to write texts? How can we allow them to develop writing skills? This is a major objective for the teaching of language, which “should be the business of all teachers in a school, given the crucial role played [by competency in writing] in the learning process and in allowing one to thrive socially” (Lord, 2009, p. 3). Our article aims to demonstrate the effects of two systems that seek to promote the acquisition of writing skills in children in the third year of primary school (10 – 12 years old): the writing project ( le chantier d’écriture) (Jolibert, 1988) and the writing workshop ( l’atelier d’écriture) (Bing, 1983; Boniface, 1992; Lafont-Terranova, 2009; Niwese, 2010). In order to compare the two, we first describe what we understand by “competency in writing” in the context of the production of texts in primary school. Secondly, we define the two methods separately, and then bring them together to evaluate their similarities and their differences. Thirdly, we define our research questions and hypotheses, and our methodology, and present the tools used for gathering data. Fourthly, the results are analyzed in order to show the strengths and weaknesses of both methods. Finally, we conclude by returning to our research hypotheses and questions. We explain how we have answered them, and how they open up new questions.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

6

How can we help pupils acquire the capacity to write texts? How can we allow them to develop writing skills? This is a major objective for the teaching of language, which “should be the business of all teachers in a school, given the crucial role played [by competency in writing] in the learning process and in allowing one to thrive socially” (Lord, 2009, p. 3). Our article aims to demonstrate the effects of two systems that seek to promote the acquisition of writing skills in children in the third year of primary school (10 – 12 years old): the writing project ( le chantier d’écriture) (Jolibert, 1988) and the writing workshop ( l’atelier d’écriture) (Bing, 1983; Boniface, 1992; Lafont-Terranova, 2009; Niwese, 2010). In order to compare the two, we first describe what we understand by “competency in writing” in the context of the production of texts in primary school. Secondly, we define the two methods separately, and then bring them together to evaluate their similarities and their differences. Thirdly, we define our research questions and hypotheses, and our methodology, and present the tools used for gathering data. Fourthly, the results are analyzed in order to show the strengths and weaknesses of both methods. Finally, we conclude by returning to our research hypotheses and questions. We explain how we have answered them, and how they open up new questions.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025