Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Inferential listening comprehension skills: A comparison between students in grade 1 and 2 in priority education vs. non-priority education

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2024. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : In disadvantaged sociodemographic areas, schools benefit from the priority education system (REP) or the reinforced priority education system (REP+) to help pupils acquire the basic literacy skills of reading, writing, and speaking. In this context, the aim of this study is precisely to examine children’s comprehension performance in grade 1 and 2, by comparing pupils educated in REP+ schools and pupils educated in non-priority education zones (HEP). To do this, all the children were given a listening comprehension task based on a story taken from children’s literature. The task consisted in answering questions posed at various moments of the story by choosing an answer from among three vignettes offered to test the pupils’ level of comprehension: one vignette illustrated the situation described by the story extract that preceded the question (i.e., a literal vignette); one vignette included elements implicitly suggested by the story, given that the inference of situational coherence mobilized the students’ general knowledge (i.e., an inferential vignette); and one vignette was considered irrelevant because it illustrated a character who was not involved in the extract preceding the question (i.e., an irrelevant vignette). We examined the choices made on this comprehension task by comparing pupils in a reinforced priority education context (REP+) with those in a non-priority education zone (HEP). The main results are informative in several respects: (1) There was no significant difference between pupils in their choice of literal vignette, regardless of the type of school or the grade level considered; (2) in grade 2, pupils in REP+ schools selected the inferential vignette less often than those in non-priority education network schools; (3) in grade 1, it was the irrelevant vignettes that revealed the presence of a difference between these two schooling contexts, to the disadvantage of pupils in REP+ schools (especially boys). These different results all confirmed the importance of implementing assessments of listening comprehension skills that make it possible to differentiate between the levels of interpretation acquired and to put in place measures to provide the best possible support for the success of all pupils.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

86

In disadvantaged sociodemographic areas, schools benefit from the priority education system (REP) or the reinforced priority education system (REP+) to help pupils acquire the basic literacy skills of reading, writing, and speaking. In this context, the aim of this study is precisely to examine children’s comprehension performance in grade 1 and 2, by comparing pupils educated in REP+ schools and pupils educated in non-priority education zones (HEP). To do this, all the children were given a listening comprehension task based on a story taken from children’s literature. The task consisted in answering questions posed at various moments of the story by choosing an answer from among three vignettes offered to test the pupils’ level of comprehension: one vignette illustrated the situation described by the story extract that preceded the question (i.e., a literal vignette); one vignette included elements implicitly suggested by the story, given that the inference of situational coherence mobilized the students’ general knowledge (i.e., an inferential vignette); and one vignette was considered irrelevant because it illustrated a character who was not involved in the extract preceding the question (i.e., an irrelevant vignette). We examined the choices made on this comprehension task by comparing pupils in a reinforced priority education context (REP+) with those in a non-priority education zone (HEP). The main results are informative in several respects: (1) There was no significant difference between pupils in their choice of literal vignette, regardless of the type of school or the grade level considered; (2) in grade 2, pupils in REP+ schools selected the inferential vignette less often than those in non-priority education network schools; (3) in grade 1, it was the irrelevant vignettes that revealed the presence of a difference between these two schooling contexts, to the disadvantage of pupils in REP+ schools (especially boys). These different results all confirmed the importance of implementing assessments of listening comprehension skills that make it possible to differentiate between the levels of interpretation acquired and to put in place measures to provide the best possible support for the success of all pupils.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025