Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Comparing the far right(s)

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2019. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : In its extreme, radical, and populist forms, the far right is probably the most studied political family in political science and political sociology. Without claiming to be exhaustive, the article offers a state of the art of existing comparative research on this theme, structured around three questions: what are the main issues addressed? What case studies, data, and methods are used? What avenues for future research are desirable in a field of study that is already so rich? The article reviews the developments in recent comparative studies in French and English languages on parties of the Radical right. I show that progressively, researchers have expanded the issues and cases of interest. However, since the 1990s, the theoretical and methodological innovation remain rather modest, especially when it comes to explaining their electoral performances. In addition, studies focusing on the “impact” of the Radical right remain focused on policy areas such as immigration and European integration. From this overview, the paper highlights on the one hand, the need for innovative comparative research that recognizes (more explicitly) the variety in the field of the far right and that critically questions the use of the word “populism”; on the other hand, the need for research that goes beyond the paradigm of the “challenger” party for the Radical right in order to grasp its evolutions in contemporary democracies.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

52

In its extreme, radical, and populist forms, the far right is probably the most studied political family in political science and political sociology. Without claiming to be exhaustive, the article offers a state of the art of existing comparative research on this theme, structured around three questions: what are the main issues addressed? What case studies, data, and methods are used? What avenues for future research are desirable in a field of study that is already so rich? The article reviews the developments in recent comparative studies in French and English languages on parties of the Radical right. I show that progressively, researchers have expanded the issues and cases of interest. However, since the 1990s, the theoretical and methodological innovation remain rather modest, especially when it comes to explaining their electoral performances. In addition, studies focusing on the “impact” of the Radical right remain focused on policy areas such as immigration and European integration. From this overview, the paper highlights on the one hand, the need for innovative comparative research that recognizes (more explicitly) the variety in the field of the far right and that critically questions the use of the word “populism”; on the other hand, the need for research that goes beyond the paradigm of the “challenger” party for the Radical right in order to grasp its evolutions in contemporary democracies.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025