<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Accidental Causes and Fortuitous Events : Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Boethius of Dacia in Discussion</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Binotto, Francesco</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2026.
							</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">fre</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <abstract>Dans la Physique, II, 5, Aristote définit l’événement fortuit comme un phénomène attribué au hasard, qui survient dans une minorité de cas dans le cadre des actions humaines. Cependant, le texte ne précise pas les conditions nécessaires à l’apparition d’un tel événement. Les commentateurs médiévaux de la Physique ont cherché à combler cette lacune. Cet article s’attache à comparer les interprétations proposées respectivement par Albert le Grand, Thomas d’Aquin, Siger de Brabant et Boèce de Dacie. Plus particulièrement, il examine la manière dont ces auteurs rendent compte de l’occurrence des événements fortuits et leur conception du statut des causes accidentelles.</abstract>
  <abstract>In Physics, II, 5, Aristotle characterizes a fortuitous event as an event, due to fortune, that happens in the minority of cases within the domain of human agency. Yet, in this text Aristotle does not clarify the conditions required in order for a fortuitous event to occur. Medieval commentators on Physics, II, 5 sought to fill this gap. I intend to compare the interpretations developed by Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Boethius of Dacia. Specifically, I examine their accounts of how a fortuitous event comes about and their conceptions of what the accidental cause of a fortuitous event is.</abstract>
  <abstract>In Fisica, II, 5, Aristotele descrive un evento fortuito come un evento, dovuto appunto alla fortuna, che accade nella minoranza dei casi all’interno del dominio delle azioni umane. Tuttavia, in quel testo Aristotele non chiarisce le condizioni necessarie affinché un evento fortuito si dia. I commentatori medievali della Fisica hanno cercato di colmare questa lacuna. Questo articolo intende comparare le interpretazioni sviluppate rispettivamente da Alberto Magno, Tommaso d’Aquino, Sigieri di Brabante e Boezio di Dacia su questo tema. In particolar modo, esso si propone di esaminare in che modo questi autori spiegano l’accadere di un evento fortuito e quale sia la loro concezione sullo statuto delle cause accidentali.</abstract>
  <note>2</note>
  <relatedItem type="original">
    <note>Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge | 92 | 1 | 2026-04-21 | p. 7-33 | 0373-5478</note>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2025-1-page-7?lang=fr&amp;redirect-ssocas=7080</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2025-1-page-7?lang=fr&amp;redirect-ssocas=7080</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260517000353.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
